‘ Introduction ‘Why were some people fated, like Job, to live a never-ending debate between themselves and their sense of what they believed life should be’? (Wright 24). This question …
His attitude to fate is ambivalent, however, insofar as he both acknowledges the existence of fate and disavows it at the same time. We can see his response to the witches first prediction (that he shall be king) in this light. He tries to take over responsibility for what is fated to him because he disdains fate. He entertains briefly the idea that he might be king without doing anything, but he quickly dismisses that idea. What he is entertaining here is the idea of leaving his character out of the equation, leaving his free will out of it, or just plain leaving his freedom out of it. That is what we do when we leave everything up to fate. To leave everything up to fate means being a pawn, or not being a character at all. It means being an automaton, or being something like a Banquo. Being like Banquo might result in being admired by pious moralizers, but my contention is that Shakespeare does not write for the satisfaction of pious moralizers. Banquo is a pawn, not a hero.
FREE Essay on Fate and Destiny - Direct Essays
The curse first appeared in pg31 of the book when Elya wanted Madame Zeroni to do him a favor to marry with gorgeous Myra. However, Madame Zeroni asked him to carry her up the mountain as she wanted to drink from the steam, and also wanted him to sing a song for her. What's more, failure would bring a curse to him and his descendants for all of eternity. Unfortunately, Elya did not realize how serious the consequence would be, and he went to Myra's home instead and failed from that promise. Since then, Staleys all experienced hard lives. And that is the reason why Stanley's family are doomed by a "fate".
On the one hand, of course, it is possible to argue that the young lovers make foolish choices while considering themselves doomed by fate. On the other hand, even though they might consider themselves subject to fate or the whims of fortune, they obviously try to determine their own future. Perhaps they blame fortune or fate too much, but they are hugely defiant of all the external forces that seem ranged against them. You might say that fate isn't really the source of those external forces (you might say its the law of the state and the family and so on), but the fact is that even as they lament what they call their fate, they try to defy it. Fate, in other words, seems to be not just an excuse but also an enemy that they try to overcome, and that's the insight you arrive at, but then ignore, in your reading of the scene in which Romeo commits suicide.Fate vs free will essays The question of whether our lives are controlled by fate or free will has this essay Continue reading Chicago. Fate vs free will.The idea that Romeo doesn't bother to check is not really faithful to the text of the play; the idea that "this doesn't work" is a little vague. What exactly does "this" refer to? Are you saying that the attempt to take responsibility isn't successful? If so, and if that were both meaningful and true, wouldn't the fact of Romeo's attempt to defy fate and take responsibility still mean that there is a little more to the question of fate and responsibility (or choice, which amounts to the same thing, since when you make a free choice you are responsible for that choice) than is implied by the rest of your essay?I feeling that fate gives me is patience, in the matter of events that I can expect or do not expect. I find that inner purpose of a life that can be discovered and realized. And with the ability to endure waiting or a provocation without being annoyed or upset for that one reason it happens. It can be a choice I take and when done I would reflect what would have gone wrong. This is what I believe.